When You Have to Deal with ‘INFINITY’

The expansion of the universe is possible by theory. The theory states ‘infinite amount of energy’. That’s how the universe has to expend infinitely. Here a problem appears straight away.

The problem is – It sounds like:

♦ the wider infinity was shrunk into the size of a pea confining the infinite amount of energy.
♦ the pea sized universe existed till it started expending.
♦ the universe thus has no outside; thus, there is no condition for a force to exist outside; and when the universe shrunk, thus, it did it all by itself alone with its infinite energy and law contained within it.

From that problem, a problem appears:

♠ no matter how much the universe has expended, no matter how far it has reached out, it still has infinite amount of energy inside it. The universe will keep expending in infinity – even after infinite amount of time has passed, it will be expending, and expending...

The main problem is the word ‘infinite’. It cannot be measured nor shown in any (mathematical) expression. It cannot be understood scientifically. It’s a simple abstract word.

The questions are –
1. How did the universe shrink from larger infinity into smaller infinity?
2. How is the smaller infinity as large/infinite as the larger infinity and vice versa?



If the answer for Q1 is –

The universe never shrunk and the Big Bang was just once to be only once and the first time was just the last time.

Then again ‘infinity’ becomes a problem:

Why did the universe exist only as a pea sized universe in its past infinity, and for a reason, it started expending only from the last 13.7 billion years ago and will keep expending into infinity?



If the answer for Q 2 is -

Infinity is just infinity whether it’s smaller or larger (as a theory).

Then,

Why does the universe expend. Why did it need to expend?
What’s the difference between big and small, what role do they play as reality inside the universe?

And what is ‘REALITY’? WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO US?