All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

(Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in Burmese)

No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.

Article 9:

Burma is known as a golden land made of several ranges (or ‘Yoma’ in Burmese) where thousands of tribal memories, wisdoms, religions, cultures and beauties of plants and animals dwell. The rivers, all of them are indeed important to the people and other existences, snake through these beautiful mountainous regions and flow from the north to the south where Indian Ocean is. The peoples, Burma has 103 ethnics, all of them used to be really generous and all they knew was to give.

Since the modern day’s dictators have systematically destroyed, now the golden land is famous for its narcotic trades, refugees, migrant workers and various atrocities and sufferings.

One day, we’ll be free again and the land will be again famous for its beauty.

Showing posts with label thought international. Show all posts
Showing posts with label thought international. Show all posts

Divide them and You will Rule

Power does not come from the people who are united
Their power stays with them
Power comes from the people when they are divided
As divided power is weak – to be controlled by
Someone who finds the opportunity

Opportunity does not always come
Opportunity must be created
Divide the people to rule the people – one group rules the other
Opportunity divides
Inequality divides
Conflict divides

The ruled will be eager to be ruled
The followers will be eager to follow
The believers will be eager to believe
They will keep themselves kept
They will trap themselves trapped
They will tie themselves tied
They will lie to themselves lied

People are divided when
They do not follow the rules of unity
They break rules and expect others do too

They blackmail themselves blackmailed
They trust by means of betrayal
They loyal by means of antisocial
They rule but they do not

Ex-CBS Reporter: Spineless Media Bosses Eroding Our First Amendment





Media freedom is necessary. Cutting ABC budget might not mean cutting budget on free media. A recent development on media reports Aussie anti-terror 'gagging' bill: 'Shambolic,' reminds 'black comedy' should not include other issues but only on terrorism exclusively. Then it's acceptable for the moment. However, this Australian rules can't affect global media. Australian domestic activities on terrorism will not be covered by Australian media, then world media will not have much information although there will be other means.

Restricting media is not controlling media. Controlling a particular issue (domestic terrorism) is not controlling entire media. Media freedom in all other issues should be maintained. A healthy nation is a well-informed nation, with no misleading media controlled by a particular organization.


Belgium: The "Sharia4Belgium” terror trial | Focus on Europe




http://youtu.be/r20ewjsPedo?t=1m29s - They should live all their lives only where the superior values exist. It would be good for them because they won't have to fight anyone. They won't have to prove how better values they have either. Everyone should report to authority and authority should take care of the situation "once and forever". 

Faith Control



Scientology's Prison Camps



MS-13 - Root Of All Evil 


the one had enough leaves
the naive comes
supply of faith & fund - nonstop customer chain 
kept an' run in broad daylight 
organized, recognized, authorized, backed up
bullies, be great! 
big bullies MAY reshape
the society at WILL an' escape! 

[no match, pathetic, the Nazi is the greatest and most glorious] 


Amanda Todd







Let’s Meet At Alice Springs


The future reality is quite predictable and inevitable. Only countries with realistic preparations will be able to keep their desired destinations. The economy and modern lifestyles that are heavily relying on energy efficiency and affordability will demand more energy for sustainable productivity. Design, technology and good planning will help the leaders with clear vision of the future reality to be able to use their full capabilities. Population planning and infrastructure planning will make everything different. Australia can be different because of its great potentials. They are unique to Australia as opportunities. Domestic structures and domestic production and consumption might become more important during the low time of international economy.  

Sustainable population growth is a solution for economy. Should Australia invite more immigrants who want to stay as Australian citizens or foreign citizens or just visiting and doing business from here? Australia could provide residential and business venues that are not any lesser quality than anywhere in China and the Middle East.

Empty buildings in modern ghost towns aside, success stories should be looked into. Australia can take similar achievements. That depends on how fast Australian businesses can change from producing the products for export to producing the products needed domestically in a short period whenever international economy is down. But that’s not possible unless there are a huge number of visitors coming in for all reasons, especially for shopping for the products they can’t online and elsewhere. Although that’s the solution, how can Australia do to bring them in?

The vast land mass of Australia is both for now and future because of its desirable characters:

Yes, Australia can. It has a good selling point – transparent politics. A recent good economic management must be an example for foreigners not to overlook Australia in the future whence this is one of Australia’s strengths.

Yes, the stability of the natural environment, social environment and political environment are quite above average for desirability for settlement, for visiting, for educating the young and for doing business. The point is Australian population will (and must) grow gradually. It has to cope with such growth and dealing with aging population. Australia needs population growth that is not for environmental disaster.

Yes, Australia can say this is a safe haven for good people.

 The value of Australian currency is also not too high at the moment – it should be. Once Australia stops exporting the natural resources, other than coal, that are now on demand, Australian economy will become only to base on the smart brains. Exports of Australian products to the world will be based on arts, engineering and designs that come from human resources. The current high value in currency is good for now although being “over-valued” is not. The economic nature is – it needs stability in everything – including currency. When Australia has to focus more on visitors, it must have its currency value that is welcoming the visitors.

But that cannot happen without the right planning: in building future towns and in the kind and quality of architecture. They are also vital to make Australia a secure place, both in economic sustainability and in environmental sustainability, in the future.

Future security of energy can come from Australian solar sector. The right planning must include energy security and affordability. Renewable energy can also be very affordable if the costs in infrastructure are low. Energy exists where sunlight exists, and wind too, in the Australian desert. It’s the place geographically and geologically stable, and inviting from the future.

The true challenge for developing into the desert is salinity – not the heat. But the dryness of the desert can be a favour to such developments.

Affordability will come from living inside energy field – i.e. the desert. Australia is a dry place but it can afford to have sufficient water. Although draught is a challenge for Australia, it’s not as bad as floods that usually cause most expensive destructions in Australia. If Australia can harvest all flood water it gets annually without depriving its natural environment, its need for water is not a problem anymore. That will need lots of dams and underground dams. But dams too must not become environmental disaster. As there might be no underground rivers in the desert, these underground dams are for storing the excesses of flood water. Long reservoirs that are built under the roads, just to reduce the costs from building infrastructures separately, will have good capacity for water supply. Australia could even afford to have farmlands that don’t irrigate the river water (too much).

When developing into the desert, underground reservoirs will be where to store these excessive amounts of water. Roads, railways, powerlines, water pipelines, telecommunication lines, and other services can incorporate together in one single structure. That means it’s the best to build them in straight line. They are to come from all major cities and they can meet somewhere in the middle of the desert. High rise and low buildings can be built along them with the right pace and space with greenhouse parks and other civilian infrastructures.

Wherever a traveller wants to go, just go and will be there without any mistake – only to need to make sure this way or that way. As all in straight line, construction and maintenance costs will be cheap – that means running cost will be cheap and affordable. Everything can become high speed.  To keep these advantages, there should be no branching roads etc. but only a single line from everyone major city.

Australia wants to see environmentally friendly electric cars, right? And also they must become driverless, right? As long as the computer in the car can cope, the passengers will always be safe, right? Also they must have the right speed and roads should have no traffic jam, right? The future should also be free of noisy jets, flying over our heads day and night – although we will need them for overseas, right? These are the reasons why straight line must be applied in everything. Just as much as we need straight people, we should have straight cities too.

Let the forest lands for the trees. We need them as much as we need the wildlife for national dignity, food security, water and energy. And free from major flood too. In the desert, Australia, rich with natural resources, can have solar harvesters and cities under their shades, with a-kilometre-wide roads and world’s fastest electric trains that attract the tourists who would like to have fun rides.  Those who want to live in the bush may live. Those who will need to live in modern buildings will move to these new areas whilst the population will be gradually growing. Also solar technology will become its best quality. Existing cities will dwindle in population but wealthy people may still enjoy the deep forest areas even as their private lands.

Is rebuilding Australia possible? If not, why not? If it doesn’t happen in a hundred year, it could happen in three hundred years. Australia started without a city.

As everything in straight line, everything will be seen. This is where Australian architects and designers have to put their best practices. It must be for Australians only environment because it’s for the making of Australia to have a new look. To be preserving Australianness with its roots and backgrounds, Australia must come up with a solution to achieve another unique ability for making Australian culture that includes all types of Australians and half Australians. Repeating a basic design, growing up upon it, and branching out from it, will bring up Australianness in culture. A group of leading designers and architect might come up with an agreeable foundation in Australian design to start as a seed of future Australianness in culture.

My dream is about high-rise buildings and residential buildings put together along the single line highways. Future constructions are my hope. I would like to see lots of construction. The high-rise buildings can be closer to the roads for the workers to work there and they should be kilometres apart where residential buildings locate between two skyscrapers. Those skyscrapers will have education sector, health sector, business sector, etc. The residential buildings will be placed at a distance from the main roads for good comfort.

Here energy is abundance and pollution free. Wherever geologically stable, geothermal sector can thrive too. And there will be more benefits. I just can’t think of any failure except if there was WWIII but it would be better than having major cities in blocks as we live now. Here, all city areas will be clean and free from vandalism as will be always seen. But white collar crimes would be the only things for Australia to have to fear. 

Australia will also have (enough) robots in the workforce. But all humans should be workers too that they can support reasonable lifestyles – sharing is everything, both for peace and dignity. Robots can work in the heat of the sun where it’s too much for humans. Where humans can work, robots must not become ideal tools. And that restriction is for cool Australia with its dignified population. Australia could become an important country globally. Many migrants from hi-tech countries would be attracted into Australia to call it their (second) home as affordability will be what Australia could constantly offer. Australia can be for both Australians and foreigners.

Here the quality of the right educations will become more important than ever. I hope Australian governments will invest more in the right educations and support and equip its future workforce with ever besting effort. I believe Australia will be ready for the future if not yet.

Herein, I think the business sector has been supporting the educational sector in two ways already: selecting and supporting the right students and supporting institutions for particular courses and teachers teaching these courses. In Australia, collectively or privately, I think, the way supporting and investing for the desired education is important. Investing in the future productivity guarantees stability growth. Investing morally will guarantee a good future. The brightest students from all levels of education should be able to achieve as much as they are capable of. It must not be the lack of money and the lack of facility that prevent them from achieving. Nurturing the students, who have the potentials which are definitely what the business sectors want, can ascertain to get the needed number of skilled workers. The institutions that are responsible for such skilled workers should definitely get support too so that they won’t have any shortages. The teachers who are responsible for nurturing future workforces should also get what they need and deserve. Focusing on all three – students, institutions and teachers, is necessary. I believe that investing in those who have potentials, not waiting until they show up with their achievements, is what business sector should do. This should become a normal cultural activity so these students should achieve what they have aimed to do in their lives. The participation of the parents and relatives, the government, the institutions and business should be the form of supporting the students. Investing in own children is of course natural, cultural and necessary. However, that only guarantees who will become rich later but not how the national economy should take shape to compare with the economies and skilled labours of other countries. This direct involvement is, I think, better than blindly relying on annual results of students. Instead on working on unrewarding jobs and wasting time, all students who are capable of achieving should be focusing on achieving.

AH! I forgot to consider the protesters (like myself sometimes). A single road means traffic disaster if the protesters go on the highway as it seems that’s the only place to do the blockades. I don’t know I have any solution for that at all. But it might be 300 years away from now.

The need of a cool leadership isn’t dubious. A good planning is a must. It must be to wrap the right ideas, technologies and designs together. The future is tomorrow and it’s not far away. Facing the reality needs courageous decision makers with clear visions – not the risk-takers. Australia must produce a mass of visionaries through its high standard education systems. It’s all for the better future for the human environment and natural environment Australia can’t risk losing.




Disclaimer:
With a sincere belief, I am dreaming and will keep doing so. Now all I see is the bright side of such an idea that has been developing. I write as much as I know. Although my writing seems crossing the academic highway, I don’t intend to make it get the other side that I don’t know anything about. Instead of in-depth discussion, I only intend to express my view and how I see. 

Undermining Industry

I don’t exactly know what an impact WikiLeak can make but it seems everything is quite normal except the media. Well, the media must talk about it indeed and keep informing the public what has been revealed. I don’t think this is a problem as long as the concerned countries can ignore all the provoking talks. And it seems they’ll keep talking until something does happen…

I do want the whole world to become an open community of different cultures, different regions, and other differences – caring for each others, rather than undermining each others. But the world is not like that for the moment. We are not ready for this type of quality friendship. The world is not at all open.

So I don’t believe in open diplomacy for now. Open diplomacy will only serve those politicians from closed countries. And there are groups that have been attempting to influence each others. They need room for diplomacy that plays like a chess game – to think ahead more than one move. Also they need alternatives (e.g. plans for solutions) that they need to plan if what on the table doesn’t work. If openness is forced to be used constantly, nothing would be succeeded properly. However, openness would be a good thing to practice if all sides are sincere. If the concerned parties are not to give up any ground, there would be a nice fight, as there is no diplomacy (as a show) as they are just open to each others.

In persuasion (for example, North Korea nuclear ambitions), secrets are absolutely necessary that persuasion mustn’t look like kid play – here the skill is more necessary than openness. If North Korea is never to give up its plan for attaining nuclear weapons, openness means just war.

Openness is best when you’re at kindergarten level when you talk to your teachers and other trusted ones. Although I have nothing to hide, if we have to reveal what cards we’re holding, then they’d be never beaten by us but we will always be again and again. With the junta of Burma, who is blunt and cares nothing, our openness will only serve its secrecy and wit. But we’ve been so open so far as we’ve been on internet and talking about whatever in our minds. But we’ve never really felt clear about what in the mind of the junta – apart from its resolve to keep the power. And there is a danger of contempt – that nobody would care any international concern anymore if they no longer had secrets; that is they would never deny anything about their flaws and dirty ambitions but would face the accuses bluntly and keep doing whatever they are doing without any room for diplomacy.

I believe the world is made of many spies and double agents. I never doubted about this. Spies will never become an extinct species. They will be needed for ever necessary to make clear about important information. ‘Open Diplomacy’ will only become a political tool.

Lies have been around. In open diplomacy, lies won’t become extinct. It will only change its skins. And with those who will never become open, things will be always as difficult as ever.

DEMO-CRACY & DEMO-CRAZY

democracy is peoples' power to give shared responsibility to their representative... to manage their welfare and general civil services ... for the peace and prosperity of their society which they can share with each others fairly and squarely...

demo-crazy is the opposite of the above description empowered by the people themselves...

Still ASLEEP?! WAKE UP!


I didn't think I had to write or should write:

Dancing or fighting peacock, I don't take either side, I don't discriminate, I don't think we must divide ourselves with such ideological disunity. That view of making devision amongst ourselves should be left behind... I do believe that.

Just consider why the communists didn't believe how Burma was not independent yet even after the declaration of independence on 4 January 1948. The reason is they were not the one who made that independence occurred. So they fought on ... but who did they fight against ... after the British had left completely? Yes, who were their targets? And their revolution went on ... selfishly... systematically to destroy ... the country ... like Polpot did!!!!!

And why did General Aung San left the army and became a politician? He could have become a dictator ... like General New Win!!!!


Well, are we all aware of how to be realistic?

Political pragmatism... (let different views face on)

I believe we must dare to see! We must dare to be honest - even if in silence.
What to see? What is that we have to be honest about to ourselves?
The causes of and the causes that keep our problems. The causes that don't give us victory. The causes that give us defeats again and again!

Just have the guts to be honest to yourselves!!!

Democracy is not an ism. It's how the reality of the world is. Whether you look a prosperous country or a ruin one, you can find how people decide the way they want to be ... and what exploits their way of thought and how they have been. And think about Burma after that... think about Burma only after you look the wider world first.

Democracy is not an ism but it's the way of life. You can see the quality of different democracies. Some people have good democracy and some have bad democracy. All of them are the reality of the world. And Burma has some chaotic thought patterns of different leaders, activists and the general. Maybe not a strange thing... some are systematic, some are idealistic, some are pragmatic and some/or most are just mixed.

Then how about you?

I rather be pragmatic even if it's not easy for everyone to practice "practical changes".

My understanding of Political Pragmatism is simple. Find the problems, and find the causes of these problems and find the solutions. Knowing problems doesn't lead to finding solutions directly. You must find the causes of problems... and you must be courageous and honest! With an open mind, you find the solutions.

I don't know whether General Aung San was pragmatic or just following the rules - not to govern the nation in military uniform. If he was just pragmatic, then yet he was not pragmatic enough in one situation - he left the military in the hand of a corrupt. Maybe he didn't have much chance to do it differently - then why?

As we all know Burma was never really Burma. Not even now. It's a union of different ethnics who thought they didn't want to be in the union forever. Why? That can be still the same - the reality now. Why? Assume it as the reality and find the cause ... Do we have to? We all know they are asking for better treatment, equality and not being discriminated in any form. And their solution is? Civil War!

What has civil war served anyway? What has it produced? What is its reality in general appearance? And its future?
Isn't it civil war what has backfired the ethnics? Far from achieving their ambitions, all they have gained is the ruin of all ... and yet they don't even get simple recognition amongst themselves!

Can we learn how to be pragmatic? And become more and more pragmatic?

Pragmatism doesn't need to overlook idealism. IDEALISM POLITICAL doesn't need to be thrown into the bin... Pragmatism is to make use of everything available pragmatically.

Fake Genius

If the UN were to govern and manage the world as the central government, could UN govern and manage the world properly? By applying all UN's declaration of human rights, universal rights, and peace as ambition, is it possible for the UN?

My answer is ...

NO!




If a people deserve the government they have, the world is not ready for peace. The world cannot be united for a few reasons. 1. People want to fight; 2. People want to believe but disqualify others' beliefs; 3. People want to compete for pride that they are better than the rest - (nationalism is important for their pride); 4. People want to survive as they are with people, language and culture intact.


If UN cannot govern the world, are all UN's 'ambitions, declarations and ways of thinking' practical or 'only reasonable but not practical'?

This is an open question that I have no answer for now!



Does UN have all answers for current situations - religious wars, economic wars and all other human conflicts? I guess not! But why?

The reason is 'human nature'! People are just supposed to suffer by all means: our beliefs, our ways of life and our ways of educations. All these three things are based on gaining influence on others and gaining control of everything. These are to have everything for own use and not to let others share. These are to change others and to change the world. These are being lack of compromise and pleasure on others' sufferings.

'You are wrong and wrong no matter what and don't tell me why you're not wrong!' And all the wrong ones don't deserve peace! And don't want others get it right. Praying for others, without actual proper prayers, to fail.

But people don't really hate each other seriously... except for a few countries/peoples in direct contact though. Naturally people don't hate before they have known others. We don't hate the people we don't know exist. We start getting trouble only with who come into our scope of senses. Emotionally we need something naturally. If you didn't know my name, if you never saw my face before, if you never heard my voice … and if you never sensed my existence, your mind could not, yes naturally cannot, hate me. If you never read my writing, you'd never thought about what I had to say and you never care because you have nothing, just nothing to care.

:)

If the UN could govern, the world would not need armies but only polices and never such fearsome weapons again and never had any such and such arm trades again. But the world likes FIGHTING, REVOLUTION, RELIGIOUS WAR, & CONTEST of STRENGTH.

The world is not made of just geniuses but Fake Geniuses as well!

Systematically

Golden population
Bearing golden fruits
Fertilizers pour down from heaven
For mans’ willing pursuits;

Huge thunderstorms bellowing the tree of humanity;
Emblems-torn their tongues too rough on the branches of humankind
As they spread their wraths,
Sawdust blown around from the being Cut, broken and fallen down
The dance of nude humiliations shown on the screens around the world;
The up-to-date Diasporas scream
On their routes snaking along their continental scrapes and oceanic grievances;
Some sank as some disappear in plights, never sighted again!
The fight for freedom, equality and rights goes on
In vain!

Guided by the music of Death Playing his viola
Resting on his left shoulder like a thin cloud of sneeze
Its strings in a breeze vibrating like a rain,
Thunderstorms roar across cold civilizations
Millions of chainsaws operating;

Flames and smogs
Shouting in the dragons’ mouths
The fiery words echoes through the sky just cracked
They fly up and they grab all the available heads gathering in a circle
They enter into the tight tunnels leading to the darkness
With the Big Bang speed their intrusions
All the armours of wisdom shielding the eardrums blown apart;

Welcome
Just welcome
This Dark wisdom
Delivered just for you
With the best wishes of the greatest wills from the kingdom of Boo
Wide openly fulfil thy Hearts for gains
And pump these molten insights to thy brains
And with that let’s ordain a new paradise together
Practically;

Africa! Unite...!

African solution lies within the integrity of Africa. Any solution for Africa, it’s Up to the level of its integrity. Asking for help is a right thing to do. Complaint and blame will not serve anything but hypocrisy. No country on earth is responsible to make Africa to become as rich as richer countries on earth.
Africa can grow its crops, produce what it needs and makes free trade among African countries with treaty and good manner.
Africa is dry; nobody can deny this, nor change it. Whenever draught occurs, African people suffer. The world can help with food and technology to tackle dry conditions.
Africa is also at war; nobody can deny this, nor change it but Africans themselves. The world can help for negotiation and political agreements but not African integrity.
Africa has to face its problem directly. This is the only solution.
But Africa is divided between ethnic lines, political differences and worse of all - the bullies. If Africa wants to keep them, then Africa has to pay for them with its prosperity.

Cluster Bomb Banned?

111 nations agreed to ban cluster bombs. Thanks a lot.

Well, it hasn't solved real problems. Many countries will keep producing and using them anyway. These bombs are also very effective strategically. Nobody wants to deny it. And these countries are allowed to fight alongside with the countries that use these bombs. As they cannot stop the future of the bombs, this success is just half-grown, I guess.

I rather suggest the world to agree to put a device inside every tiny bomb. This device must cause the bomb to explode itself. And there will be no unexploded bombs scattering and ambushing to kill civilians.

I guess this tiny device might be a dangerous issue in handling the bombs; however, it must be safer than when they’re hidden around nearby population.

Anyway, I have to leave it in the hands of experts.

It’s Time

We know that the junta has tried to act like victor that cares nothing but greed, self-centredness, pride, negligence, ignorance and stubbornness that are practiced with the powers of brute force, the threat to lose of life, lose of belongings, causing injuries, etc, without mercy. For its inhumane pride and illegal wealth, it’s ready to do anything – we all know. It’s willing to sacrifice the lives and properties of the people and soldiers to keep its palace in Nay-pyi-daw. Nothing else matter but to do everything right so that powers and laws will stay in its hand.

Pleasing the communist China is vital here – as we all know; act according to What the Beijing government has to say. As the international pressure is mounting due to cyclone Nargis, whilst China is also hit by earthquakes and needing the international sympathy, the junta has to come and visit the cyclone survivors – unwillingly but to please everyone outside Burma. Well, if the junta does have a heart for them, this should have happened since the cyclone hit the delta.

Three weeks ago, the junta listened to nobody – but its gut feeling – to win referendum; now it has at least on paper. But it was the time the people needed helps to survive. Previously, they needed emergency warnings and mass evacuation. Sadly India doesn’t have Burmese radio program to give a hand to the regional population even though it’s climbing up to become a super power nation and tragically to have influence on the region and wider world - but we won’t blame this.

But we must condemn the junta for its way of contempt of life and religion. This is its choice of policy and lifestyle: Killing, torturing, looting, raping, demolishing villages, suppressing conscience , endangering the environment by unsustained exploitation, destroying cultures and traditions, keep the fear among the population, destroying morality of the society, depriving the children of the civilians from education and health, the list can go on and on.
\
One of the most serious things is the junta is oppressing the true nature of Buddhism to control it and use it for political purpose as Buddhists are the majority in Burma – apart from suppressing other religions as if it were for Buddhism.

We know what a hundred heartless soldiers with machine guns can do to 50,000 unarmed demonstrators. We cannot blame the saffron for its failure. We knew it wouldn’t succeed with verbal support from international community.

It’s true that our people have to liberate themselves. It’s true that the energy and power for liberation are up to our people and mainly inside our country. It’s true that the good organizational skills and the quality of leadership of our leaders are vital to achieve freedom by mobilizing the people.

But I never got wrong that the people cannot do anything without the commitment and physical supports of the international community – particularly the free world.

A government is to govern and manage a country – rather with a dutiful manner. A government doesn’t need legitimacy given directly to it but it must have mutual understanding with the population it is governing. All government must have capability to manage the resources, trade and tax; its good services are various but mainly to fix the problems, improve or expand the developments, start new developments, invest for the future, secure peace, prosperity and the rule of civil laws, and keep all these good momentums running smoothly. A government must be able to manage all basic commodities to be affordable, keep inflation down and allocating the services where they are really needed. A government must be able to rescue and save lives wherever whenever. The organization that kills civilians for survival is not a legal group – it’s a criminal group.
Without good services, there is no government. A government that doesn’t govern and manage the country is not a legitimate government – whether it is elected sometimes in the past, whether it won referendum to be government eternally. Without the acceptance of the population, a government is not a government – it has lost legitimacy.

A government cannot keep a war forever – especially a civil war. It must win or negotiate – this is only to make conditions that peace is re-established to save lives and resources. A government must make all parties satisfied, their rights are met, and integrity is crystal clear. This is mainly concerned to Burma as grievances are the cause of infighting. A government is not an organisation that keeps wars for its own sake.
There are good reasons to start a war: to save a country, to save civilians, to gain independence, to bring down a dictator, to secure peace and give way to future prosperity of local population, etc.
Some wars are graceful and necessary.

We, Burmese people, have to see long-term security and stability by scarifying whatever necessary.

The junta has taken the victory from the referendum in Nargis crisis whilst the people, all other organizations and international governments were overwhelmed by rescue and relief efforts. The referendum was the strategy of the junta to keep the laws in the hands of the generals. And the reality of referendum has been implemented and legalised the rule of brutality.

We all know the junta is not capable of rescue and relief. Yet it’s banned the world effort. The results are predictable. We won’t see the junta will open the borders in time to safe lives. We must understand what can happen because that.

We know we could never trust the ASEAN. We never got any trustworthy aids from this organization. All we have got is blunt favour to the junta and its lip services to gain the favour from the world. The reality on the ground is different as we all know.

Therefore, we must not feel satisfied with the service of ASEAN only that will make the junta look good and its mission will be only to keep the junta in place. We are already facing the same dilatory tactic of both the junta and ASEAN. Along side this, the UN is also hijacked by softly-softly approach again mainly because of ASEAN.

We have already favoured ASEAN’s approaches. We’re in danger again to be held in the pattern of self-inflicting thinking and actions. We have been also divided again. We must learn lessons not to become numb in the game of these people. We should have condemned them already.

We have to ask the UN – what is it waiting for? As we know it cannot answer, that it’s made of opposite sides – we must seek actions vigorously from the countries that can. We must seek the relief efforts of all organizations and all countries that we must ask them to do that now. We must also make the people to seek aids and supplies even if necessary to cross the borders. We must encourage the people with information and directions.

The ships of US, UK and France have been there for weeks. We must let them go back only with mission-accomplishment. We must encourage them by providing information and direction and support actions.

But I wonder why the US had to decide to delay alongside with France, UK, Germany, Australia, etc. Will ASEAN change their mind to go home and do nothing about the crisis?

However, there are no sufficient forces with the navy – I don’t know how that can threaten the junta to deny humanitarian supplies and aids workers – apart from blocking the opportunity to observe the referendum. But now the referendum has finished and the junta has mission-accomplished.

Therefore, it must open all borders and let the aid workers in.

RESPONSE FROM THE SINGAPORE CHAIR OF ASEAN ON THE CYCLONE NARGIS DISASTER IN MYANMAR: MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS PRESS STATEMENT, 8 MAY 2008

In response to media queries, the Singapore Chair of ASEAN confirmed that the situation in Myanmar following Cyclone Nargis was discussed during the informal consultations among EAS senior officials. He said that the officials expressed their sadness and sympathy over the massive loss of lives caused by the cyclone, and noted that tens of thousands of Myanmar people are still missing. They noted that many countries have offered humanitarian assistance packages to Myanmar following the outbreak of the disaster. They reiterated readiness to provide further assistance, including sending medical and rescue teams, to Myanmar. They look forward to having these personnel on the ground as soon as possible to augment the Myanmar Government's relief efforts.

. . . . .

MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS

SINGAPORE

8 MAY 2008

Boycotting Olympics They Claimed. But It’s Not True!

Actually it’s not against Olympics. Clearly it’s an effort seeking Olympics to consider to boycott China. Even though it’s about sports, harmony and unity, everyone knows that China doesn’t attempt Olympics this way. The way it sees Olympics in its capital is its modern glory, successes, developments and influence. The way China handles Olympics torch relays is exactly talking for itself.

Many people expected China’d change fundamentally if the world lets it to achieve economically and politically. However, China has proved the expectations are wrong. The way it’s handling Burma issue, for example, by supporting the military regime with income and arms and the way it used its veto in UNSC against positive political development (in Burma) are clearly its way of self-interest. Also China’s support against solutions for Durrfa crisis means it has no interest about improving the world.

Only when the crackdown on recent Tibetan movement against China’s occupation, boycotting against Chinese Olympics became louder and heard by the wider world. The position of IOC wasn’t so clear. Perhaps, it wasn’t so clear what the activists were boycotting - china or Olympics. The world was divided, as so many people thought it’s about sport; and boycotting sport is not fair - they claimed so.

As expected, the world witnessed the enthusiasm of exile Tibetan people and their clear expression on China’s occupation of Tibet. Suddenly Chinese communities around the world appeared to show their support of China.

It’s naturally right for a Chinese to love their country, China, and support it. But sadly it’s unclear whether they also are supporting the actions of their country, mainly about Burma, Durfar and Tibet, by showing hostility against the Tibetans. The cut between two societies, mainland Chinese and the Tibetans, is emotionally thorough.

Whether the world likes to see peace in Tibet, the occupation of China cannot develop it as China has the policy of cultural genocide and economic advantage against others. As China is becoming global power, its expression of its contempt of human rights and the interests of the UN are becoming clearer. Amid ongoing global movements, China sent a shipload of weapon to Zimbabwe.

If China cannot accept peace, security and rights of the suffering populations of these three societies, I must support Olympics and the world to boycott China.

Taiwan, China & Australia

Well, if China and Taiwan ever to unify again, I’d rather accept the Taiwanese government as the legitimate government and the communists as rebels. Whether Taiwan wants independence, its government is democratic and elected by the people and this can be applied to the mainland Chinese too even though they cannot vote. Perhaps the Taiwanese ought to welcome them to opinion polls and this will make them to taste the values of democracy. At least, the people of Hong Kong can do so as they know very well about what democracy is – they would particularly be interested in the Taiwanese freedom as their freedom is vanishing.

Also the Australian government needs to approach Taiwan as democratic alliance. Australia needs to sustain democracy in the region and promote it, particularly wherever China attempts to keep its influences against the free world. It must not be the way of Australian policy regards to Asia-Pacific region to succumb to the communists’ disease of depleting natural resources for becoming a super power in the world and sustaining human sufferings, abusing human rights in its own territory and Tibet and supporting dictators where energy is its interest. The Labor government must distinguish its values regard to workers and labor rights against the Communists who have been abusing labor rights by under valuing its workers.

Iraq War - Is Just

Now my mind is on Iraq war again as have just come through a debate on it. Whether the intention of the Bush's administration was to destroy Iraq (for no reason other than just to destroy), the invasion did free the Iraqi from Saddam regime which the Iraqi people themselves were trying to bring down.
It's unfortunate to the ordinary people that their leaders couldn't unite the nation but armed their men and started infighting and worse they brought outsiders to spoil the situation. If they fought but not only for the sake of fighting but also for reconciliation, they could have shortened the war and the suffering period of the people. Actually, politics is rather difficult and no conflicts around the world ended easily even thought there was such a war known as seven-day-war(?).
Actual death toll killed by the Americans and the actual death toll killed by the infighting and terrorism can be compared and should be. Whence the Americans tried to solved the problems and invested billion after billion, the world was silent as they couldn't take the burdens onto their shoulders - of course this made the US image uglier.
I'm only trying to emphasize what I see in this war.
Understandably it is just for the Americans to say how they don't want to bare the burdens that the entire world has been trying to avoid. I don't blame the world because they have no chance to involve and solve this crisis as the Iraqi leaders are not actually ready to stop the conflict all together but enjoying the backing of confronting sides - the west and the terrorism backed by a few nations.
Consider where do the funding on terrorisms come from? How can without actual fundings, the terrorists afford such expensive activities?
Well, it's OK if one wants to say 'they are not terrorists but resistant groups'. If they are really resisting the Americans and the invaders, then why can't they negotiate on the table to make the American out? Why have they needed to kill the Iraqi people as well?
Both Sonni and Shiite are Iraqis and they should come together to a debate without violence. Then many lives and moneys can be saved.

Taiwan Should Boycott Beijing Olypic

I think Taiwan should not send a team to 8.8.08 Beijing Olympic. It should rather consider hosting its own Olympic games if it can afford. However, this should be for the sake of peace and political advantage.

I believe it has a lot to gain from not sending a team. If the reasons are human rights issues, it could win the heart and mind of some mainland Chinese. Whilst the suppressed world has been seeking to boycott this particular moment of Beijing, Taiwan will become their hero (country). If Taiwan is considering itself as being suppressed by the mainland China particularly politically, it has now a chance to act now.

It might provoke Beijing in this particular way but I guess Chinese government also would be glad not to see any Taiwanese in Olympics. But no Taiwanese should worry about this. They rather should back boycotting. They also should not go and watch the games. They can show unity and patriotism certainly.

Kosovo's Independence

I don't feel any particular the way Kosovo became independent. This was predicted even though I wasn't so sure. There was no choice as there was no solution reached. I don't know what the Serb leaders offered the Kosovans physically and as promises for peace and developments but I believe the Kosovans wanted their independence anyway and this is their only choice. The war against the Kosovan Albanians made the two communities never to reconcile as a country.

The problem was Russia's involvement in the case. The Serbs shouldn't have sought Russia's vocal aid. Russia has been completely on the opposite side of the west and has been playing political games in its own sake in the region and in the world. As Russia has been seeking attention or a fresh influence in the world by siding with the wrong people, such as dictators, the free world would trust it never. The steps of Russia have been so far clear in the recent political arenas in the region and in Asia. It has the only intention - to do the opposite against the west whether to do the right thing or the wrong. This has been discredited it so far. Right now, Russia is too selfish and untrustworthy. I don't think the Russian leaders care too much about this or they wouldn't keep this sitution as it is.

Nobody dares to trust the future without independence and this happened with East Timor and Ache too. If there wasn't tsunami that claimed hundred of thousands of victims, Ache could be still in war.

I believe it's the right choice that the Kosovans have taken even though this is truely unfair to the Kosovan Serbs.

Search This Blog

Powered By Blogger
HTML Comment Box is loading comments...