All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.
(Article 1 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights in Burmese)
No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest, detention or exile.
Article 9:
Burma is known as a golden land made of several ranges (or ‘Yoma’ in Burmese) where thousands of tribal memories, wisdoms, religions, cultures and beauties of plants and animals dwell. The rivers, all of them are indeed important to the people and other existences, snake through these beautiful mountainous regions and flow from the north to the south where Indian Ocean is. The peoples, Burma has 103 ethnics, all of them used to be really generous and all they knew was to give.
Since the modern day’s dictators have systematically destroyed, now the golden land is famous for its narcotic trades, refugees, migrant workers and various atrocities and sufferings.
One day, we’ll be free again and the land will be again famous for its beauty.
Pages
Divide them and You will Rule
Ex-CBS Reporter: Spineless Media Bosses Eroding Our First Amendment
Restricting media is not controlling media. Controlling a particular issue (domestic terrorism) is not controlling entire media. Media freedom in all other issues should be maintained. A healthy nation is a well-informed nation, with no misleading media controlled by a particular organization.
Belgium: The "Sharia4Belgium” terror trial | Focus on Europe
http://youtu.be/r20ewjsPedo?t=1m29s - They should live all their lives only where the superior values exist. It would be good for them because they won't have to fight anyone. They won't have to prove how better values they have either. Everyone should report to authority and authority should take care of the situation "once and forever".
Faith Control
Scientology's Prison Camps
MS-13 - Root Of All Evil
Amanda Todd
Let’s Meet At Alice Springs
Undermining Industry
I do want the whole world to become an open community of different cultures, different regions, and other differences – caring for each others, rather than undermining each others. But the world is not like that for the moment. We are not ready for this type of quality friendship. The world is not at all open.
So I don’t believe in open diplomacy for now. Open diplomacy will only serve those politicians from closed countries. And there are groups that have been attempting to influence each others. They need room for diplomacy that plays like a chess game – to think ahead more than one move. Also they need alternatives (e.g. plans for solutions) that they need to plan if what on the table doesn’t work. If openness is forced to be used constantly, nothing would be succeeded properly. However, openness would be a good thing to practice if all sides are sincere. If the concerned parties are not to give up any ground, there would be a nice fight, as there is no diplomacy (as a show) as they are just open to each others.
In persuasion (for example, North Korea nuclear ambitions), secrets are absolutely necessary that persuasion mustn’t look like kid play – here the skill is more necessary than openness. If North Korea is never to give up its plan for attaining nuclear weapons, openness means just war.
Openness is best when you’re at kindergarten level when you talk to your teachers and other trusted ones. Although I have nothing to hide, if we have to reveal what cards we’re holding, then they’d be never beaten by us but we will always be again and again. With the junta of Burma, who is blunt and cares nothing, our openness will only serve its secrecy and wit. But we’ve been so open so far as we’ve been on internet and talking about whatever in our minds. But we’ve never really felt clear about what in the mind of the junta – apart from its resolve to keep the power. And there is a danger of contempt – that nobody would care any international concern anymore if they no longer had secrets; that is they would never deny anything about their flaws and dirty ambitions but would face the accuses bluntly and keep doing whatever they are doing without any room for diplomacy.
I believe the world is made of many spies and double agents. I never doubted about this. Spies will never become an extinct species. They will be needed for ever necessary to make clear about important information. ‘Open Diplomacy’ will only become a political tool.
Lies have been around. In open diplomacy, lies won’t become extinct. It will only change its skins. And with those who will never become open, things will be always as difficult as ever.
DEMO-CRACY & DEMO-CRAZY
demo-crazy is the opposite of the above description empowered by the people themselves...
Still ASLEEP?! WAKE UP!
I didn't think I had to write or should write:
Dancing or fighting peacock, I don't take either side, I don't discriminate, I don't think we must divide ourselves with such ideological disunity. That view of making devision amongst ourselves should be left behind... I do believe that.
Just consider why the communists didn't believe how Burma was not independent yet even after the declaration of independence on 4 January 1948. The reason is they were not the one who made that independence occurred. So they fought on ... but who did they fight against ... after the British had left completely? Yes, who were their targets? And their revolution went on ... selfishly... systematically to destroy ... the country ... like Polpot did!!!!!
And why did General Aung San left the army and became a politician? He could have become a dictator ... like
Well, are we all aware of how to be realistic?
Political pragmatism... (let different views face on)
I believe we must dare to see! We must dare to be honest - even if in silence.
What to see? What is that we have to be honest about to ourselves?
The causes of and the causes that keep our problems. The causes that don't give us victory. The causes that give us defeats again and again!
Just have the guts to be honest to yourselves!!!
Democracy is not an ism. It's how the reality of the world is. Whether you look a prosperous country or a ruin one, you can find how people decide the way they want to be ... and what exploits their way of thought and how they have been. And think about Burma after that... think about Burma only after you look the wider world first.
Democracy is not an ism but it's the way of life. You can see the quality of different democracies. Some people have good democracy and some have bad democracy. All of them are the reality of the world. And Burma has some chaotic thought patterns of different leaders, activists and the general. Maybe not a strange thing... some are systematic, some are idealistic, some are pragmatic and some/or most are just mixed.
Then how about you?
I rather be pragmatic even if it's not easy for everyone to practice "practical changes".
My understanding of Political Pragmatism is simple. Find the problems, and find the causes of these problems and find the solutions. Knowing problems doesn't lead to finding solutions directly. You must find the causes of problems... and you must be courageous and honest! With an open mind, you find the solutions.
I don't know whether General Aung San was pragmatic or just following the rules - not to govern the nation in military uniform. If he was just pragmatic, then yet he was not pragmatic enough in one situation - he left the military in the hand of a corrupt. Maybe he didn't have much chance to do it differently - then why?
As we all know Burma was never really Burma. Not even now. It's a union of different ethnics who thought they didn't want to be in the union forever. Why? That can be still the same - the reality now. Why? Assume it as the reality and find the cause ... Do we have to? We all know they are asking for better treatment, equality and not being discriminated in any form. And their solution is? Civil War!
What has civil war served anyway? What has it produced? What is its reality in general appearance? And its future?
Isn't it civil war what has backfired the ethnics? Far from achieving their ambitions, all they have gained is the ruin of all ... and yet they don't even get simple recognition amongst themselves!
Can we learn how to be pragmatic? And become more and more pragmatic?
Pragmatism doesn't need to overlook idealism. IDEALISM POLITICAL doesn't need to be thrown into the bin... Pragmatism is to make use of everything available pragmatically.
Fake Genius
My answer is ...
NO!
If a people deserve the government they have, the world is not ready for peace. The world cannot be united for a few reasons. 1. People want to fight; 2. People want to believe but disqualify others' beliefs; 3. People want to compete for pride that they are better than the rest - (nationalism is important for their pride); 4. People want to survive as they are with people, language and culture intact.
If UN cannot govern the world, are all UN's 'ambitions, declarations and ways of thinking' practical or 'only reasonable but not practical'?
This is an open question that I have no answer for now!
Does UN have all answers for current situations - religious wars, economic wars and all other human conflicts? I guess not! But why?
The reason is 'human nature'! People are just supposed to suffer by all means: our beliefs, our ways of life and our ways of educations. All these three things are based on gaining influence on others and gaining control of everything. These are to have everything for own use and not to let others share. These are to change others and to change the world. These are being lack of compromise and pleasure on others' sufferings.
'You are wrong and wrong no matter what and don't tell me why you're not wrong!' And all the wrong ones don't deserve peace! And don't want others get it right. Praying for others, without actual proper prayers, to fail.
But people don't really hate each other seriously... except for a few countries/peoples in direct contact though. Naturally people don't hate before they have known others. We don't hate the people we don't know exist. We start getting trouble only with who come into our scope of senses. Emotionally we need something naturally. If you didn't know my name, if you never saw my face before, if you never heard my voice … and if you never sensed my existence, your mind could not, yes naturally cannot, hate me. If you never read my writing, you'd never thought about what I had to say and you never care because you have nothing, just nothing to care.
:)
If the UN could govern, the world would not need armies but only polices and never such fearsome weapons again and never had any such and such arm trades again. But the world likes FIGHTING, REVOLUTION, RELIGIOUS WAR, & CONTEST of STRENGTH.
The world is not made of just geniuses but Fake Geniuses as well!
Systematically
Bearing golden fruits
Fertilizers pour down from heaven
For mans’ willing pursuits;
Huge thunderstorms bellowing the tree of humanity;
Emblems-torn their tongues too rough on the branches of humankind
As they spread their wraths,
Sawdust blown around from the being Cut, broken and fallen down
The dance of nude humiliations shown on the screens around the world;
The up-to-date Diasporas scream
On their routes snaking along their continental scrapes and oceanic grievances;
Some sank as some disappear in plights, never sighted again!
The fight for freedom, equality and rights goes on
In vain!
Guided by the music of Death Playing his viola
Resting on his left shoulder like a thin cloud of sneeze
Its strings in a breeze vibrating like a rain,
Thunderstorms roar across cold civilizations
Millions of chainsaws operating;
Flames and smogs
Shouting in the dragons’ mouths
The fiery words echoes through the sky just cracked
They fly up and they grab all the available heads gathering in a circle
They enter into the tight tunnels leading to the darkness
With the Big Bang speed their intrusions
All the armours of wisdom shielding the eardrums blown apart;
Welcome
Just welcome
This Dark wisdom
Delivered just for you
With the best wishes of the greatest wills from the kingdom of Boo
Wide openly fulfil thy Hearts for gains
And pump these molten insights to thy brains
And with that let’s ordain a new paradise together
Practically;
Africa! Unite...!
Africa can grow its crops, produce what it needs and makes free trade among African countries with treaty and good manner.
Africa is dry; nobody can deny this, nor change it. Whenever draught occurs, African people suffer. The world can help with food and technology to tackle dry conditions.
Africa is also at war; nobody can deny this, nor change it but Africans themselves. The world can help for negotiation and political agreements but not African integrity.
Africa has to face its problem directly. This is the only solution.
But Africa is divided between ethnic lines, political differences and worse of all - the bullies. If Africa wants to keep them, then Africa has to pay for them with its prosperity.
Cluster Bomb Banned?
Well, it hasn't solved real problems. Many countries will keep producing and using them anyway. These bombs are also very effective strategically. Nobody wants to deny it. And these countries are allowed to fight alongside with the countries that use these bombs. As they cannot stop the future of the bombs, this success is just half-grown, I guess.
I rather suggest the world to agree to put a device inside every tiny bomb. This device must cause the bomb to explode itself. And there will be no unexploded bombs scattering and ambushing to kill civilians.
I guess this tiny device might be a dangerous issue in handling the bombs; however, it must be safer than when they’re hidden around nearby population.
Anyway, I have to leave it in the hands of experts.
It’s Time
Pleasing the communist China is vital here – as we all know; act according to What the Beijing government has to say. As the international pressure is mounting due to cyclone Nargis, whilst China is also hit by earthquakes and needing the international sympathy, the junta has to come and visit the cyclone survivors – unwillingly but to please everyone outside Burma. Well, if the junta does have a heart for them, this should have happened since the cyclone hit the delta.
Three weeks ago, the junta listened to nobody – but its gut feeling – to win referendum; now it has at least on paper. But it was the time the people needed helps to survive. Previously, they needed emergency warnings and mass evacuation. Sadly India doesn’t have Burmese radio program to give a hand to the regional population even though it’s climbing up to become a super power nation and tragically to have influence on the region and wider world - but we won’t blame this.
But we must condemn the junta for its way of contempt of life and religion. This is its choice of policy and lifestyle: Killing, torturing, looting, raping, demolishing villages, suppressing conscience , endangering the environment by unsustained exploitation, destroying cultures and traditions, keep the fear among the population, destroying morality of the society, depriving the children of the civilians from education and health, the list can go on and on.
\
One of the most serious things is the junta is oppressing the true nature of Buddhism to control it and use it for political purpose as Buddhists are the majority in Burma – apart from suppressing other religions as if it were for Buddhism.
We know what a hundred heartless soldiers with machine guns can do to 50,000 unarmed demonstrators. We cannot blame the saffron for its failure. We knew it wouldn’t succeed with verbal support from international community.
It’s true that our people have to liberate themselves. It’s true that the energy and power for liberation are up to our people and mainly inside our country. It’s true that the good organizational skills and the quality of leadership of our leaders are vital to achieve freedom by mobilizing the people.
But I never got wrong that the people cannot do anything without the commitment and physical supports of the international community – particularly the free world.
A government is to govern and manage a country – rather with a dutiful manner. A government doesn’t need legitimacy given directly to it but it must have mutual understanding with the population it is governing. All government must have capability to manage the resources, trade and tax; its good services are various but mainly to fix the problems, improve or expand the developments, start new developments, invest for the future, secure peace, prosperity and the rule of civil laws, and keep all these good momentums running smoothly. A government must be able to manage all basic commodities to be affordable, keep inflation down and allocating the services where they are really needed. A government must be able to rescue and save lives wherever whenever. The organization that kills civilians for survival is not a legal group – it’s a criminal group.
Without good services, there is no government. A government that doesn’t govern and manage the country is not a legitimate government – whether it is elected sometimes in the past, whether it won referendum to be government eternally. Without the acceptance of the population, a government is not a government – it has lost legitimacy.
A government cannot keep a war forever – especially a civil war. It must win or negotiate – this is only to make conditions that peace is re-established to save lives and resources. A government must make all parties satisfied, their rights are met, and integrity is crystal clear. This is mainly concerned to Burma as grievances are the cause of infighting. A government is not an organisation that keeps wars for its own sake.
There are good reasons to start a war: to save a country, to save civilians, to gain independence, to bring down a dictator, to secure peace and give way to future prosperity of local population, etc.
Some wars are graceful and necessary.
We, Burmese people, have to see long-term security and stability by scarifying whatever necessary.
The junta has taken the victory from the referendum in Nargis crisis whilst the people, all other organizations and international governments were overwhelmed by rescue and relief efforts. The referendum was the strategy of the junta to keep the laws in the hands of the generals. And the reality of referendum has been implemented and legalised the rule of brutality.
We all know the junta is not capable of rescue and relief. Yet it’s banned the world effort. The results are predictable. We won’t see the junta will open the borders in time to safe lives. We must understand what can happen because that.
We know we could never trust the ASEAN. We never got any trustworthy aids from this organization. All we have got is blunt favour to the junta and its lip services to gain the favour from the world. The reality on the ground is different as we all know.
Therefore, we must not feel satisfied with the service of ASEAN only that will make the junta look good and its mission will be only to keep the junta in place. We are already facing the same dilatory tactic of both the junta and ASEAN. Along side this, the UN is also hijacked by softly-softly approach again mainly because of ASEAN.
We have already favoured ASEAN’s approaches. We’re in danger again to be held in the pattern of self-inflicting thinking and actions. We have been also divided again. We must learn lessons not to become numb in the game of these people. We should have condemned them already.
We have to ask the UN – what is it waiting for? As we know it cannot answer, that it’s made of opposite sides – we must seek actions vigorously from the countries that can. We must seek the relief efforts of all organizations and all countries that we must ask them to do that now. We must also make the people to seek aids and supplies even if necessary to cross the borders. We must encourage the people with information and directions.
The ships of US, UK and France have been there for weeks. We must let them go back only with mission-accomplishment. We must encourage them by providing information and direction and support actions.
But I wonder why the US had to decide to delay alongside with France, UK, Germany, Australia, etc. Will ASEAN change their mind to go home and do nothing about the crisis?
However, there are no sufficient forces with the navy – I don’t know how that can threaten the junta to deny humanitarian supplies and aids workers – apart from blocking the opportunity to observe the referendum. But now the referendum has finished and the junta has mission-accomplished.
Therefore, it must open all borders and let the aid workers in.
RESPONSE FROM THE SINGAPORE CHAIR OF ASEAN ON THE CYCLONE NARGIS DISASTER IN MYANMAR: MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS PRESS STATEMENT, 8 MAY 2008
. . . . .
MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS
SINGAPORE
8 MAY 2008
Boycotting Olympics They Claimed. But It’s Not True!
Many people expected China’d change fundamentally if the world lets it to achieve economically and politically. However, China has proved the expectations are wrong. The way it’s handling Burma issue, for example, by supporting the military regime with income and arms and the way it used its veto in UNSC against positive political development (in Burma) are clearly its way of self-interest. Also China’s support against solutions for Durrfa crisis means it has no interest about improving the world.
Only when the crackdown on recent Tibetan movement against China’s occupation, boycotting against Chinese Olympics became louder and heard by the wider world. The position of IOC wasn’t so clear. Perhaps, it wasn’t so clear what the activists were boycotting - china or Olympics. The world was divided, as so many people thought it’s about sport; and boycotting sport is not fair - they claimed so.
As expected, the world witnessed the enthusiasm of exile Tibetan people and their clear expression on China’s occupation of Tibet. Suddenly Chinese communities around the world appeared to show their support of China.
It’s naturally right for a Chinese to love their country, China, and support it. But sadly it’s unclear whether they also are supporting the actions of their country, mainly about Burma, Durfar and Tibet, by showing hostility against the Tibetans. The cut between two societies, mainland Chinese and the Tibetans, is emotionally thorough.
Whether the world likes to see peace in Tibet, the occupation of China cannot develop it as China has the policy of cultural genocide and economic advantage against others. As China is becoming global power, its expression of its contempt of human rights and the interests of the UN are becoming clearer. Amid ongoing global movements, China sent a shipload of weapon to Zimbabwe.
If China cannot accept peace, security and rights of the suffering populations of these three societies, I must support Olympics and the world to boycott China.
Taiwan, China & Australia
Also the Australian government needs to approach Taiwan as democratic alliance. Australia needs to sustain democracy in the region and promote it, particularly wherever China attempts to keep its influences against the free world. It must not be the way of Australian policy regards to Asia-Pacific region to succumb to the communists’ disease of depleting natural resources for becoming a super power in the world and sustaining human sufferings, abusing human rights in its own territory and Tibet and supporting dictators where energy is its interest. The Labor government must distinguish its values regard to workers and labor rights against the Communists who have been abusing labor rights by under valuing its workers.
Iraq War - Is Just
It's unfortunate to the ordinary people that their leaders couldn't unite the nation but armed their men and started infighting and worse they brought outsiders to spoil the situation. If they fought but not only for the sake of fighting but also for reconciliation, they could have shortened the war and the suffering period of the people. Actually, politics is rather difficult and no conflicts around the world ended easily even thought there was such a war known as seven-day-war(?).
Actual death toll killed by the Americans and the actual death toll killed by the infighting and terrorism can be compared and should be. Whence the Americans tried to solved the problems and invested billion after billion, the world was silent as they couldn't take the burdens onto their shoulders - of course this made the US image uglier.
I'm only trying to emphasize what I see in this war.
Understandably it is just for the Americans to say how they don't want to bare the burdens that the entire world has been trying to avoid. I don't blame the world because they have no chance to involve and solve this crisis as the Iraqi leaders are not actually ready to stop the conflict all together but enjoying the backing of confronting sides - the west and the terrorism backed by a few nations.
Consider where do the funding on terrorisms come from? How can without actual fundings, the terrorists afford such expensive activities?
Well, it's OK if one wants to say 'they are not terrorists but resistant groups'. If they are really resisting the Americans and the invaders, then why can't they negotiate on the table to make the American out? Why have they needed to kill the Iraqi people as well?
Both Sonni and Shiite are Iraqis and they should come together to a debate without violence. Then many lives and moneys can be saved.
Taiwan Should Boycott Beijing Olypic
I believe it has a lot to gain from not sending a team. If the reasons are human rights issues, it could win the heart and mind of some mainland Chinese. Whilst the suppressed world has been seeking to boycott this particular moment of Beijing, Taiwan will become their hero (country). If Taiwan is considering itself as being suppressed by the mainland China particularly politically, it has now a chance to act now.
It might provoke Beijing in this particular way but I guess Chinese government also would be glad not to see any Taiwanese in Olympics. But no Taiwanese should worry about this. They rather should back boycotting. They also should not go and watch the games. They can show unity and patriotism certainly.
Kosovo's Independence
The problem was Russia's involvement in the case. The Serbs shouldn't have sought Russia's vocal aid. Russia has been completely on the opposite side of the west and has been playing political games in its own sake in the region and in the world. As Russia has been seeking attention or a fresh influence in the world by siding with the wrong people, such as dictators, the free world would trust it never. The steps of Russia have been so far clear in the recent political arenas in the region and in Asia. It has the only intention - to do the opposite against the west whether to do the right thing or the wrong. This has been discredited it so far. Right now, Russia is too selfish and untrustworthy. I don't think the Russian leaders care too much about this or they wouldn't keep this sitution as it is.
Nobody dares to trust the future without independence and this happened with East Timor and Ache too. If there wasn't tsunami that claimed hundred of thousands of victims, Ache could be still in war.
I believe it's the right choice that the Kosovans have taken even though this is truely unfair to the Kosovan Serbs.

